Rent renewals will rise by a maximum of 2% until 30th June
Rent renewals will rise by a maximum of 2% until 30th June GTRES

Spain’s National Bureau of Statistics (INE) reported in April inflation hit 9.8% Year-Over-Year during March 2022 (up from 7.6% on the previous month). This is the highest figure in over 37 years, since 1985. It is a major source of concern.

In last month’s article (Renewing a tenancy in Spain: how to update your rental – 23rd March 2022) I discussed the huge impact a sharp rise in inflation would have in Spanish long term rentals if left unchecked.

In view of this spike in inflation, the Spanish Government has taken swift action and approved last week a batch of measures to fight it. Amongst them, is a law to enforce inflation control in all long-term rentals.

Starting on Friday 1st of April, and ending on the 30th of June 2022, the government will cap inflation rise on rental contracts over a 3-month period.

For professional landlords, the rise is capped at 2%. For laymen, there is freedom to negotiate. However, if no agreement is reached, a 2% limit will also apply. In practice, this will likewise translate into a 2% limit for laymen.

In principle, this measure is only ‘temporary’ and should last only for the next 3 months. However, in Spanish “temporary” is codeword for permanent. You can realistically expect the government to chain 3-month renewals on this measure whilst inflation remains high (this could be years). 

This means landlords will be left powerless to pass on the sharp rise in inflation to their tenants via rental updates, as until now. In effect, landlords going forward will be ‘subsidising’ their tenants’ long term rentals on pocketing the inflation loss.

In view of this, landlords may remove their properties from long term lets (reducing supply) or destine them instead as holiday rentals (short-term rentals). This shortage in (long term) supply will translate into these lets becoming even more expensive than what they already are.

This is a prime example on how legislative consumer over protectionism (tenants) may backfire spectacularly affecting precisely the vulnerable collective which protection is sought by lawmakers. For every action there is a consequence, cause and effect.

Further reading from idealista: